From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Scott v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 6, 2000
268 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

January 6, 2000

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Michael Scott, Attica, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter Crary of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, CARPINELLO, GRAFFEO and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges the determination finding him guilty of arson and the destruction of State property in violation of prison disciplinary rules. The charges stemmed from a fire that occurred in petitioner's prison cell. A correction officer extinguished the fire and noted that a mattress, sheet, pillow case and two blankets were completely destroyed. It was noted in the investigation report that petitioner was alone in the block at the time of the fire and that no other inmates were in the facility. In our view, the misbehavior report and the investigation reports, combined with the inferences that can be drawn therefrom, constitute substantial evidence supporting the charges of arson and destruction of State property (see, Matter of Rose v. Goord, 259 A.D.2d 818; Matter of Phillips v. Goord, 252 A.D.2d 642).

Moreover, nothing in the record supports petitioner's assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased and not impartial (see, Matter of Monge v. Goord, 251 A.D.2d 804; Matter of Applegate v. Coombe, 237 A.D.2d 836, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 803). Furthermore, we reject petitioner's contention that intermittent gaps in the hearing transcript warrant reversal. "[T]he missing testimony `is neither material to the determination nor of such significance as to preclude meaningful review'" (Matter of Torres v. Coombe, 234 A.D.2d 710, 710-711, quoting Matter of Rodriquez v. Coughlin, 167 A.D.2d 671, 671). We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Graffeo and Mugglin, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Scott v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 6, 2000
268 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Scott v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL SCOTT, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 6, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
700 N.Y.S.2d 593

Citing Cases

Le Tam v. Goord

In our view, the misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed to apprise petitioner of the alleged misconduct…

Marcus v. Goord

Petitioner was in the cell with his cellmate at the time of the incident and petitioner's lack of exclusive…