From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Scifo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 2000
272 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued March 20, 2000.

May 1, 2000.

In a proceeding for the judicial settlement of the account of Paul C. Scifo, the Executor of the Estate of Charles P. Scifo and the attorney-in-fact for Charles P. Scifo, the objectant, Frank J. Scifo, appeals from (1) an order of the Surrogate's Court, Nassau County (Radigan, S.), dated March 10, 1999, which granted Paul C. Scifo's motion to dismiss his petition dated September 8, 1998, found him in violation of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 for frivolous litigation conduct, directed him to pay costs and sanctions of $1,000 to the Lawyer's Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, and directed Paul C. Scifo to submit a supplemental affidavit documenting the time he spent representing himself in this proceeding for the purpose of calculating an award of an attorney's fee, and (2) an order of the same court, dated June 24, 1999, which directed him to pay $5,775 in attorney's fees to Paul C. Scifo.

JoAnn M. Scifo, Floral Park, N.Y., for appellant.

Law Offices of Sanford F. Young, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Jan B. Rothman of counsel), and Paul C. Scifo, Franklin Square, N Y (respondent pro se), for respondent (one brief filed).

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the appellant personally.

Contrary to the appellant's contentions, the Surrogate properly dismissed his petition which alleged, inter alia, wrongful ejectment, and granted costs, sanctions, and attorney's fees against him because of his frivolous and vexatious litigation practices in this proceeding. Moreover, the Surrogate providently exercised his discretion in setting the amount of attorney's fees (see, Nicastro v. Park, 186 A.D.2d 805, citing DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete, 70 N.Y.2d 879, 881).

The respondent's request to impose a sanction against the appellant for the filing and prosecution of this appeal is denied.

BRACKEN, J.P., O'BRIEN, KRAUSMAN and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Scifo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 2000
272 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Scifo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Charles P. Scifo, deceased. Frank J. Scifo, appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
714 N.Y.S.2d 680

Citing Cases

PU v. SHAHZAD

PER CURIAM. We find no abuse of discretion in the imposition of sanctions under 22 NYCRR § 130-1.1(a) against…

JALOR GRAPHICS v. Universal

Appeal from order dated December 27, 1999 denying defendant's motion for an award of sanctions and other…