From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sciarra v. Donnelly

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 28, 1974
34 N.Y.2d 970 (N.Y. 1974)

Opinion

Argued August 27, 1974

Decided August 28, 1974

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, CARMINE A. VENTIERA, J.

Joseph Slavin and David B. Vaughn for appellants.

George F. Donnelly, respondent, pro se.


Order reversed, without costs, and the petition under section 330 of the Election Law granted. Although the voter signatures in dispute contained the proper addresses, incorrect election or assembly districts were listed. This was not a case of confusion created by reapportionment. The provisions of subdivision 2 of section 135 of the Election Law must be strictly followed. (Cf. Matter of Maurin v. Allis, 28 A.D.2d 810, affd. 20 N.Y.2d 671. ) Moreover, as noted by the dissenter at the Appellate Division, this was not a case in which the voters' prior election or assembly districts were listed.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STALEY. Taking no part: Judge STEVENS.

Designated pursuant to section 2 of article VI of the State Constitution.


Summaries of

Matter of Sciarra v. Donnelly

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Aug 28, 1974
34 N.Y.2d 970 (N.Y. 1974)
Case details for

Matter of Sciarra v. Donnelly

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NICHOLAS J. SCIARRA et al., Appellants, v. GEORGE F…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Aug 28, 1974

Citations

34 N.Y.2d 970 (N.Y. 1974)
360 N.Y.S.2d 410
318 N.E.2d 602

Citing Cases

McCrae v. Forte

Furthermore, when the parties' arguments at the hearing as well as their evidence is weighed, Forte has…

McCrae v. Forte

"While substantial compliance is acceptable as to details of form, there must be strict compliance with…