Summary
upholding validity of waiver of right of election where petitioner failed to present proof that he had been fraudulently induced to sign waiver
Summary of this case from Matthews and Fields Lumber v. New England Ins. Co.Opinion
February 16, 2000
Appeal from Decree of Onondaga County Surrogate's Court, Wells, S. — SCPA.
PRESENT: GREEN, A. P. J., WISNER, PIGOTT, JR., HURLBUTT AND SCUDDER, JJ.
Decree unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum:
Petitioner and Ruth Schuellain (decedent) married in 1957. On December 19, 1985, petitioner executed a waiver of his right of election against decedent's last will ( see, EPTL 5-1.1-A). Following decedent's death in June 1997, petitioner filed a notice that he was exercising his right of election, and he commenced the instant proceeding pursuant to SCPA 1421 seeking a determination that he is entitled to take his elective share of decedent's estate.
Surrogate's Court properly denied the petition and determined that the waiver of petitioner's right of election is valid. Petitioner failed to present proof supporting his allegation that he was fraudulently induced to execute the waiver ( see, Matter of Sunshine, 51 A.D.2d 326, 327-328, affd 40 N.Y.2d 875). Indeed, petitioner "established nothing more than [his] own dereliction in failing to acquaint [him]self with the provisions of the [waiver] and to obtain the benefit of independent legal counsel. Although this dereliction may have caused [him] to be ignorant of the precise terms of the [waiver], the fact remains that, absent fraud or other misconduct, parties are bound by their signatures" ( Matter of Garbade, 221 A.D.2d 844, 846, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 803). Further, petitioner's challenge to the validity of the waiver, which accrued upon the execution of the waiver, is time-barred ( see, Pommer v. Trustco Bank, 183 A.D.2d 976, 977, lv dismissed in part and denied in part 81 N.Y.2d 758).