From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Schell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 28, 2001
286 A.D.2d 56 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

September 28, 2001.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., PINE, HAYES, SCUDDER AND BURNS, JJ.


Order of censure entered.


Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on February 14, 1994, and maintained an office for the practice of law in Fairport. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with acts of professional misconduct arising from his misappropriation of law firm retainer funds. Respondent filed an answer admitting the allegations of the petition, and appeared before this Court to submit matters in mitigation.

We conclude that respondent violated the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

DR 1-102 (a) (4) ( 22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [4]) — engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation; and

DR 1-102 (a) (7) ( 22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [7]) — engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer.

We note in mitigation that the misconduct occurred at a time when respondent was suffering from depression and the side effects of medication that was prescribed for his depression. Additionally, we note that respondent admitted the misconduct, made restitution and cooperated with the Grievance Committee's investigation. Finally, we have considered respondent's previously unblemished record and commitment to providing pro bono legal service. Accordingly, we conclude that respondent should be censured.

All concur.

Order of sensure entered.


Summaries of

Matter of Schell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 28, 2001
286 A.D.2d 56 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Schell

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF GEORGE A. SCHELL, JR., AN ATTORNEY, RESPONDENT. GRIEVANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 28, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 56 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 295

Citing Cases

Matter of Feindt

Finally, we have considered respondent's previously unblemished record and that respondent voluntarily…

In re Ciccone

Finally, we have considered the previously unblemished record of respondent and her expression of extreme…