From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sauer v. American Car Foundry Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 19, 1952
280 App. Div. 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

November 19, 1952.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Board.


The decision under appeal resulted from appellant's application for the board's review of a referee's decision which had awarded disability compensation to claimant for reduced earnings on the basis of 80% disability. The board modified the referee's decision and award to a lesser and tentative rate of compensation based upon 50% of disability, held adversely to appellant's contention that claimant had unreasonably refused employer's proffered offer of a sweeping job and continued the case to a referee's calendar "for further consideration of the degree of claimant's disability." The contention of appellant that claimant unreasonably refused the sweeping job is based wholly upon physicians' reports to the effect that he was able to perform light work and that it was advisable that he do so. Whether the proffered job was within the medical specifications was not developed by evidence by either of the parties in interest. Decision and award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board. Foster, P.J., Brewster, Bergan and Halpern, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Sauer v. American Car Foundry Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 19, 1952
280 App. Div. 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Matter of Sauer v. American Car Foundry Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of EDWARD SAUER, Respondent, against AMERICAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1952

Citations

280 App. Div. 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Rosinsky v. City of Binghamton

Further, since it does not appear that any application has been made to review the Referee's decisions (see…