From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Santo v. Symington Machine Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1933
188 N.E. 107 (N.Y. 1933)

Opinion

Argued October 3, 1933

Decided October 17, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

William B. Davis and E.C. Sherwood for appellants.

Henry R. Dutcher for claimant-respondent.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( John R. O'Hanlon of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Santo v. Symington Machine Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1933
188 N.E. 107 (N.Y. 1933)
Case details for

Matter of Santo v. Symington Machine Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ROMEO SANTO, Respondent, against SYMINGTON…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 17, 1933

Citations

188 N.E. 107 (N.Y. 1933)
188 N.E. 107

Citing Cases

Matter of Croce v. Ford Motor Co.

On several occasions we have reviewed cases involving the interpretation of the phrase "actual earnings" on…