From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Santiago v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 2, 2000
270 A.D.2d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

March 2, 2000

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Rolando Santiago, Dannemora, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., CREW III, PETERS, SPAIN and GRAFFEO, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a disciplinary hearing petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violent conduct, bribery and making threats. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination, contending, inter alia, that the misbehavior report should have been dismissed because it was written one day after the alleged incident. Contrary to petitioner's assertion, there is no requirement that the report be prepared the day of the incident (see, 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 [a]; see also, Matter of Greene v. Coombe, 242 A.D.2d 796, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 803).

We also reject petitioner's contention that the misbehavior report does not constitute sufficient evidence of his guilt. The misbehavior report, which was authored by an eyewitness to the event, was sufficient to substantiate the alleged misconduct (see,Matter of Dexter v. Goord, 257 A.D.2d 936). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

CARDONA, P.J., CREW III, PETERS, SPAIN and GRAFFEO, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Santiago v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 2, 2000
270 A.D.2d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Santiago v. Senkowski

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROLANDO SANTIAGO, Petitioner, v. DANIEL SENKOWSKI, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 2, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 676

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Hamilton v. Selsky

Contrary to petitioner's claim, our review of the hearing transcript does not disclose that the Hearing…

Cusamano v. Mr. Sobek, Correctional Officer

(Dkt. No. 42, Part 1, ¶¶ 60-66 [Plf.'s Rule 7.1 Response].)See Greene v. Coombe, 242 A.D.2d 796, 662 N.Y.S.2d…