From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 22, 1926
242 N.Y. 497 (N.Y. 1926)

Opinion

Argued January 11, 1926

Decided January 22, 1926

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Albert Ottinger, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for appellant.

William H. Hotchkiss for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs against State Industrial Board, on ground that section 13 of the Workmen's Compensation Law does not permit an award to the employee for medical treatment, etc., furnished by the employer.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 22, 1926
242 N.Y. 497 (N.Y. 1926)
Case details for

Matter of Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of YETTA SANDBERG against SEYMOUR DRESS CO.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 22, 1926

Citations

242 N.Y. 497 (N.Y. 1926)
152 N.E. 400

Citing Cases

Matter of Weisberg v. Alexander Brothers F. Co.

In Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co., Inc. ( 215 App. Div. 728) this court held that, under section 13 Work.…

Matter of Finkelstein v. New York Merchandise Co.

The claimant paid the medical and hospital bills and this award is to reimburse him. "Section 13 Work. Comp.…