Opinion
April 16, 1998
Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging an administrative determination finding him guilty of using a controlled substance. Based upon our review of the record, we find that the two positive test results indicating the presence of opiates, together with the misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who performed the tests, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Lahey v. Kelly, 71 N.Y.2d 135, 143). The fact that an inadvertent clerical error was made by a correction officer in transcribing a test number onto the inventory form provided to petitioner does not, under the particular circumstances here, mandate a contrary conclusion (see, Matter of Martinez v. Ross, 243 A.D.2d 914, appeal dismissed 91 N.Y.2d 887; Matter of Maldonado v. Selsky, 162 A.D.2d 843, 844). There is no dispute that the test numbers contained in the urinalysis test request form, the urinalysis procedure form and EMIT calibration slips coincided. We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be unpersuasive.
Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Mercure, Crew III and White, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.