From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rushfield

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 4, 1995
667 A.2d 684 (N.J. 1995)

Opinion

December 4, 1995.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having on August 23, 1995, filed with the Court its decision concluding that MARK C. RUSHFIELD, of ROSELAND, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be reprimanded on the basis of a guilty plea to a three-count federal information charging respondent with violating the ERISA-reporting provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 1023 and § 1024, misdemeanor offenses under 29 U.S.C. § 1131, and respondent having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK C. RUSHFIELD is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

Matter of Rushfield

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 4, 1995
667 A.2d 684 (N.J. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Rushfield

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MARK C. RUSHFIELD, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 4, 1995

Citations

667 A.2d 684 (N.J. 1995)
667 A.2d 684

Citing Cases

In re Convery

The DRB acknowledged that in most federal misdemeanor cases the Court has imposed terms of suspension ranging…