From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rouse v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 4, 1983
97 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

November 4, 1983

Appeal from the Court of Claims, Moriarty, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The State appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims that it was negligent for failing to remove stone and gravel from the side of a section of an interstate highway where claimant was injured while riding his motorcycle. Since the State created the hazardous condition by placing the stone and gravel on the highway two weeks prior to the accident, claimant was not required to establish notice as a prerequisite for recovery (see Muszynski v City of Buffalo, 29 N.Y.2d 810, affg on opn below 33 A.D.2d 648). There is ample support in the record for the trial court's findings that the State was negligent, and that such negligence was the proximate cause of claimant's injuries.


Summaries of

Matter of Rouse v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 4, 1983
97 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Matter of Rouse v. State

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of BRIAN W. ROUSE, Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1983

Citations

97 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Eddie Maldonado v. State Thruway Authority

Based on our independent review of the weight of this evidence ( see Bush v State of New York, 57 AD3d 1066,…