From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ross v. Sunrise Food Exchange

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 1948
273 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

January 14, 1948.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Board.

Present — Hill, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Russell, JJ.


The evidence reveals that the claimant's regular hours of employment were from 9:00 A.M. to 12:00 noon, and from 1:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. About five o'clock on the afternoon of September 3, 1946, the manager of the employer told the claimant to "hurry home" so as to eat supper, and "hurry right back" for the purpose of taking a stock inventory. It appears that compliance with the order of the manager was to take place during the working hours of the claimant. Claimant on arriving at her home and alighting from her car stubbed her toe and missed a step going into the house and sustained accidental injuries in the nature of a comminuted fracture of the lower third of the left humerus. The board found that the injuries sustained by claimant were accidental and arose out of and in the course of her employment. From the facts it appears that the claimant was under the compulsion of the employer. The evidence sustains the finding of the board. Award unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to be divided equally between the Workmen's Compensation Board and claimant-respondent, with disbursements to each.


Summaries of

Matter of Ross v. Sunrise Food Exchange

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 1948
273 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Matter of Ross v. Sunrise Food Exchange

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of RUTH ROSS, Respondent, against SUNRISE FOOD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1948

Citations

273 App. Div. 833 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Matter of Maltese v. New York St. Crim. Court

In finding a compensable injury in this case, the Board, in its amended decision and brief, relies a great…

Matter of Carroll v. Provenzano

Control thus exercised over the employee by the employer, in part at least for the latter's advantage,…