From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rosenman v. Seafood City, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 27, 1966
26 A.D.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

October 27, 1966


Judgment, denominated an order, in proceeding under article 78 of CPLR granting petitioner stockholders an examination of the books of account of respondent corporation unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to petitioners-respondents. In affirming, the court notes that Special Term was not correct in referring to Mr. Richman as a director of the corporation in question. But this makes no difference. On general principles applicable to a close corporation with petitioners owning, concededly, at least 49% of the stock, and without a satisfactory showing of bad faith on their part, petitioners were entitled to the relief sought ( Matter of Mook v. American Fabrics Co., 24 A.D.2d 971).

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, McNally, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Rosenman v. Seafood City, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 27, 1966
26 A.D.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Matter of Rosenman v. Seafood City, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MAX ROSENMAN et al., Respondents, v. SEAFOOD CITY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 27, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Matter of Botwin v. Central Structural Steel

Consequently, she has been denied all information as to the affairs of the corporation and there has been no…