From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rosemond v. Corscadden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

March, 1928.


Order reversed, as a matter of law, and not in the exercise of discretion, and motion denied, without costs, on the ground that the justice had no authority to make the order, the defect complained of being jurisdictional, and the statute requiring the verification being mandatory; and on the authority of Matter of Swarthout ( 76 Misc. 24); Matter of Murphy ( 189 App. Div. 135), and Matter of King (155 id. 720). Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Whitmyer and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Davis, J., dissents and votes for affirmance.

See Election Law, § 135, as amd. by Laws of 1923, chap. 597. — [REP.


Summaries of

Matter of Rosemond v. Corscadden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1928
223 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Matter of Rosemond v. Corscadden

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES ROSEMOND and Another, Citizens of the State of New…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1928

Citations

223 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Matter of Lyden v. Katz

It has been clearly declared that the town or city in which a signer of a nominating petition resides must be…