From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Roman v. N.Y. City Police Dept

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1993
198 A.D.2d 143 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 18, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Beverly Cohen, J.].


Petitioner, despite indicating that she would respond to her tour of duty, albeit late, never appeared. After numerous telephone calls from friends, co-workers and supervisors, and an attempt to enter petitioner's apartment by a friend, police were provided a key to her apartment by the building manager and gained entry. They observed petitioner unconscious on the couch, apparently intoxicated, and a bottle of rum on the floor. After regaining consciousness, she went to change, leaving her fellow officers in the living room, where they observed a straw and cocaine residue in plain view. This residue and the positive results of a urine test constitute substantial evidence sufficient to support the termination of employment. That the police were beneficially motivated in entering the apartment is conceded by petitioner. Under the standards set forth in People v Mitchell ( 39 N.Y.2d 173, cert denied 426 U.S. 953), the emergency doctrine justified the warrantless entry.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Roman v. N.Y. City Police Dept

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1993
198 A.D.2d 143 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Roman v. N.Y. City Police Dept

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of IRIS ROMAN, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 143 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
603 N.Y.S.2d 856

Citing Cases

People v. Manning

In People v. Molnar ( 98 N.Y.2d 328), the Court upheld a warrantless entry into an apartment, holding that…