From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rodriguez v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 9, 1995
216 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 9, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Fallon, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination that petitioner, an inmate at Attica Correctional Facility, violated inmate rule 107.11 ( 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [8] [ii]) on two occasions is supported by substantial evidence. The inmate misbehavior report described each incident in detail, and each report was authored by an eyewitness (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966; Matter of Perez v. Wilmot, 67 N.Y.2d 615, 616-617). Petitioner's denial and contrary testimony raised a credibility issue, and the Hearing Officer was entitled to credit the statements made in each misbehavior report (see, Matter of Perez v. Wilmot, supra, at 617). The contention that petitioner was denied his right to a fair and impartial Hearing Officer is devoid of merit.


Summaries of

Matter of Rodriguez v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 9, 1995
216 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Rodriguez v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of OSCAR RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
629 N.Y.S.2d 716

Citing Cases

Matter of Crandall v. Coughlin

The determination is supported by substantial evidence (see, People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130,…