From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rochester Tel. Corp. v. Public Serv. Comm

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1983
447 N.E.2d 40 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Argued January 3, 1983

Decided February 10, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Sam Laniado and David E. Blabey for appellant.

Michael T. Tomaino, Roger H. Kessel and Jonathan H. Winer for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division correctly held that the commission did not have the authority, under subdivision 2 of section 113 of the Public Service Law, to order the petitioner to pass on to its customers the tax deduction resulting from its passing on of a tax refund. We express no opinion on whether the commission, in ruling on a general rate case, may order a passing on of the tax deduction, a question we need not reach on this appeal.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG, MEYER and SIMONS concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Rochester Tel. Corp. v. Public Serv. Comm

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1983
447 N.E.2d 40 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Matter of Rochester Tel. Corp. v. Public Serv. Comm

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORPORATION, Respondent, v. PUBLIC…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 10, 1983

Citations

447 N.E.2d 40 (N.Y. 1983)
447 N.E.2d 40
460 N.Y.S.2d 492

Citing Cases

NYS ELEC. & GAS CORP. v. PSC

The court is not persuaded by NYSEG's argument in this regard. The Commission's authority to compel a utility…

Niagara Mohawk v. Public Serv

II The Public Service Commission possesses only those powers expressly delegated to it by the Legislature, or…