From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 22, 1995
215 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 22, 1995

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court, Kings County (Bloom, S.).


Ordered that the decree is reversed, on the law, with costs payable by the respondent personally, and probate is denied.

There was no evidence of a meeting of the minds between the testator and the attesting witnesses that the instrument they were being asked to sign as witnesses was testamentary in character (see, EPTL 3-2.1 [a] [3]; see also, Matter of Pulvermacher, 305 N.Y. 378, 383; Matter of Turell, 166 N.Y. 330, 337).

In light of our determination, we do not reach the objectants' remaining contention. Balletta, J.P., O'Brien, Thompson and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 22, 1995
215 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Roberts

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of DONALD T. ROBERTS, Deceased. LEE E…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 22, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
628 N.Y.S.2d 500

Citing Cases

Matter of Pirozzi

he testator publish to the attesting witnesses that the document was his or her will (EPTL 3-2.1). Petitioner…

In the Matter of Pilon

"[S]ubstantial compliance will be sufficient and no particular form of words is required, or is necessary, to…