From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Reynoso v. LeFevre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 30, 1993
199 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 30, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Clinton County (Lewis, J.).


We affirm. Petitioner's application is legally insufficient as it is devoid of any factual support for his allegation that the disciplinary determination rendered against him on March 23, 1992 is affected by procedural errors, due process violations or violations of the Correction Law (see, People ex rel. Hendy v Leonardo, 173 A.D.2d 992, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 857; Matter of Malik v Berlinland, 158 A.D.2d 836, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 704).

Weiss, P.J., Mercure, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Reynoso v. LeFevre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 30, 1993
199 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Reynoso v. LeFevre

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of IGNACIO REYNOSO, Appellant, v. EUGENE S. LeFEVRE, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
608 N.Y.S.2d 127

Citing Cases

White v. LaManna

The petitioner waived his claim that he was denied the right to call witnesses at the hearing, as he told…

Brooks v. Piecuch

While the Southern District of New York has stated "[w]hether it is appropriate to defer some investigative…