From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Redmond v. Alexander Smith Sons Carpet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1927
221 App. Div. 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Summary

In Alexander v. Redmond, 180 F. 92 (C.C.A.2d), a jury was impaneled in an equity case to try the issues of fact; after plaintiff rested, defendant's motion for a directed verdict was granted.

Summary of this case from Lee v. State Bank Trust Co.

Opinion

September, 1927.


Award reversed, and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that the award rests on the uncorroborated hearsay statements of the deceased. Cochrane, P.J., Van Kirk, Hinman, McCann and Whitmyer, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Redmond v. Alexander Smith Sons Carpet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1927
221 App. Div. 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

In Alexander v. Redmond, 180 F. 92 (C.C.A.2d), a jury was impaneled in an equity case to try the issues of fact; after plaintiff rested, defendant's motion for a directed verdict was granted.

Summary of this case from Lee v. State Bank Trust Co.
Case details for

Matter of Redmond v. Alexander Smith Sons Carpet

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of DELIA REDMOND, Respondent, against ALEXANDER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1927

Citations

221 App. Div. 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Mitchell-Woodbury Co.

'" It is not necessary to decide whether under § 60 of the bankruptcy act an actual intent on the part of the…

Pyle v. Texas Transport & Terminal Co.

The security given up was worthless and the substitution of good security amounted to a preference. In…