From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Quinn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1944
267 App. Div. 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Summary

In Matter of Quinn (267 App. Div. 913, affd. 293 N.Y. 787, supra), respondents, residents of the Town of Mt. Pleasant, brought a proceeding in the Appellate Division to compel the removal of the Receiver of Taxes.

Summary of this case from People v. Di Napoli

Opinion

March 20, 1944.


In a proceeding before this court, for the removal of the respondent Guion from his office as Receiver of Taxes of the Town of Mount Pleasant, appellants moved in the Westchester County Court for the inspection of certain Grand Jury minutes of testimony given by Guion before the Grand Jury, for use in this removal proceeding, and for other relief. The District Attorney joined in the application. The County Court denied the motion for lack of power and the appeal is from the order denying the motion. The order is reversed on the law and the facts and the motion granted. This court determines that the Westchester County Court had the power to grant the application and that under the circumstances in this case the motion should have been granted as a matter of discretion. Close, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 961.]


Summaries of

Matter of Quinn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1944
267 App. Div. 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

In Matter of Quinn (267 App. Div. 913, affd. 293 N.Y. 787, supra), respondents, residents of the Town of Mt. Pleasant, brought a proceeding in the Appellate Division to compel the removal of the Receiver of Taxes.

Summary of this case from People v. Di Napoli
Case details for

Matter of Quinn

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of OWEN M. QUINN et al., Appellants, for an Order Permitting…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 20, 1944

Citations

267 App. Div. 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Citing Cases

People v. Di Napoli

Implicit in the absence of objection on the part of the District Attorney is the lack of detriment in respect…

People v. Behan

Public interest, therefore, required that this testimony be made available to the police commissioner, to be…