From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pryce v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 2001
281 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 1, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Franklin Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Winston Pryce, Roosevelt, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Frank Brady of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from creating a disturbance, harassment, refusing a direct order and making threats. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, together with the testimony adduced at the hearing, constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Barnes v. Goord, 279 A.D.2d 685; Matter of Kwiatkowski v. Goord, 276 A.D.2d 986). Although petitioner claims that the correction officer who authored the report fabricated the charges in retaliation for a grievance that petitioner filed against him, we find no reason to disturb the Hearing Officer's determination resolving this credibility issue against petitioner (see, Matter of Daum v. Goord, 270 A.D.2d 745, 746; Matter of James v. Couture, 266 A.D.2d 604, 605). We have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim of Hearing Officer bias, and conclude that they are either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Pryce v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 2001
281 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Pryce v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF WINSTON PRYCE, Petitioner, v. GLENN GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 570

Citing Cases

Vega v. Selsky

In his testimony, petitioner disputed the officer's account, asserting that the officer had initially…

Rizzuto v. D. Sullivan

Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules…