From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Programming & Systems, Inc. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1984
61 N.Y.2d 738 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Argued January 4, 1984

Decided January 17, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ANDREW R. TYLER, J.

Lester J. Tanner for appellant.

David Paget and Gail S. Port for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

An environmental impact statement mandated by ECL 8-0109 must be prepared and made available to the public before "any significant authorization is granted for a specific proposal." ( Matter of Tri-County Taxpayers Assn. v Town Bd., 55 N.Y.2d 41, 47.) While preliminary steps in the planning of the 42nd Street Development Project have been taken, an environmental impact statement is not required until a specific project plan for the development is actually formulated and proposed. At that time, prior to acting on the proposal, the statement must be prepared, filed and made available to the public. (ECL 8-0109, subd 6.)

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and KAYE concur; Judge SIMONS taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Programming & Systems, Inc. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1984
61 N.Y.2d 738 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Programming & Systems, Inc. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PROGRAMMING AND SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant, v. NEW YORK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 17, 1984

Citations

61 N.Y.2d 738 (N.Y. 1984)
472 N.Y.S.2d 912
460 N.E.2d 1347

Citing Cases

Queensbury Assn. v. Town Bd.

Both the Appellate Division and Court of Appeals held the adoption of the subject resolutions by the Board to…

Nassau/Suffolk Neighborhood Network v. Town of Oyster Bay

Further, the court does not believe that the Town is required by SEQRA to leave the matter of site selection…