From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pringle v. Spanakos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 24, 1994
207 A.D.2d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

August 24, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant's contention with respect to the propriety of the ruling of the Supreme Court validating certain of the signatures that the Board of Elections of the City of New York had initially invalidated, is unpreserved for appellate review, inasmuch as the appellant never raised this claim before the Supreme Court (see, e.g., Matter of Gary v. McCall, 196 A.D.2d 612). In any event, we find no basis in the record to disturb the Supreme Court's findings with respect to the validity of those signatures. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Pringle v. Spanakos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 24, 1994
207 A.D.2d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Pringle v. Spanakos

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SANDRA L. PRINGLE, Respondent, v. GEORGE M. SPANAKOS et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 24, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 515 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 245

Citing Cases

In re Romaine

Moreover, Allen both initialed and explained the contested alterations ( see Matter of Jonas v Velez, 65 NY2d…