From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Price Chopper Operating v. Liquor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 18, 1976
53 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

June 18, 1976


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the State Liquor Authority which found that petitioner had violated subdivision 1 of section 65 Alco. Bev. Cont. of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law and imposed a deferred 20-day suspension of petitioner's off-premises beer license. Petitioner attacks the sufficiency and competency of the evidence upon which the agency relied in making its determination, based as it was on the testimony of the minor who testified that he purchased a quantity of beer from petitioner's grocery store. Questions of credibility were presented which were within the province of the Authority (Matter of Avon Bar Grill v O'Connell, 301 N.Y. 150, 153). We also find that the penalty herein imposed by respondent was a reasonable exercise of discretion. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Koreman, P.J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Main and Larkin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Price Chopper Operating v. Liquor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 18, 1976
53 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Price Chopper Operating v. Liquor

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PRICE CHOPPER OPERATING CO., INC., Petitioner, v. STATE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1976

Citations

53 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Tego's Tavern, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

We confirm. We have held that at evidentiary hearings where the licensee contests disciplinary charges,…

Matter of Cumberland Farms v. St. Liquor Auth

The hearing officer reasonably discredited the clerk's testimony. It was for the administrative agency to…