From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Presley v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 17, 1974
43 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

January 17, 1974

Present — Del Vecchio, J.P., Marsh, Witmer and Cardamone, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Petitioner retired from the teaching profession on June 30, 1961. In September, 1962 she was hired as an elementary school teacher by the respondent board under a first year probationary contract for the school year beginning July 1, 1962. She entered into a similar second year probationary contract for the school year beginning July 1, 1963 and a third year probationary contract for the school year beginning July 1, 1964. At the termination of the three years of probationary appointments, the recommendation of the Superintendent that she be given tenure effective September 1, 1965 was approved by the respondent board. At the time of each appointment by respondent section 503 Educ. of the Education Law provided that if a retired teacher receiving a retirement allowance returned to active service, payments of her retirement allowance were suspended during the time she was in active service. While section 211 Retire. Soc. Sec. of the Retirement and Social Security Law effective July 1, 1964 requires the approval of the Commissioner of Education upon a showing that there are not readily available other qualified persons, as a prerequisite to the employment by a school district of a "retired person", the record does not establish that petitioner was a "retired person" as defined by section 210 Retire. Soc. Sec. of the Retirement and Social Security Law at the time she was granted tenure. Her retirement allowance was suspended by the provisions of section 503 Educ. of the Education Law and she received no retirement allowance following her employment by respondent in September, 1962. It does not appear that she has since made application for voluntary retirement nor does it appear that her status under tenure has been terminated after a hearing on charges as provided by section 3013 Educ. of the Education Law. No valid basis therefore appears for the termination of petitioner's services by respondent at the beginning of the 1971-1972 year.


Summaries of

Presley v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 17, 1974
43 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Presley v. Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARY PRESLEY, Respondent, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 17, 1974

Citations

43 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

Ripley v. School Committee of Norwood

The school committee also points to cases from other jurisdictions where courts have considered the effect of…

Kuhnle v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Those reaching retirement age have earned their benefits by longer years of service and the greater monetary…