From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Poormon v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 5, 1987
134 A.D.2d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

November 5, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.


Petitioner, a stores clerk at Newark Developmental Center in Wayne County, suffered a job-related neck injury in September 1982 while moving supplies. As a result of the injury, she was absent from her job for approximately six months. After returning to work, she reinjured her neck in September 1983. In October 1984, petitioner filed an application for ordinary disability retirement benefits claiming she was permanently disabled because of a cervical disc injury. A hearing followed and respondent ultimately determined that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing her duties as a stores clerk. This proceeding ensued.

Respondent is vested with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits and his determinations must be upheld if supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Perritano v. Regan, 120 A.D.2d 867, 868). Here, petitioner testified that she was no longer able to lift without pain and, since her job entailed lifting, that she was unable to perform her duties. Her personal physician agreed, stating that petitioner should not resume her position since bending and lifting caused her pain. His conclusions were based primarily upon petitioner's subjective complaints and not objective medical evidence. After performing a series of tests, the physician for the New York State Employees' Retirement System was unable to find objective evidence of petitioner's injury. It was his opinion that, even if petitioner's complaints of pain were accepted, she would probably be able to perform the task of a stores clerk. In essence, respondent was faced with a dearth of objective medical proof and conflicting medical opinions as to petitioner's capacity to return to work. Since respondent's weighing of conflicting medical opinions is dispositive, we are constrained to uphold his determination (see, Matter of Legault v. Regan, 105 A.D.2d 505).

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Weiss, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Poormon v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 5, 1987
134 A.D.2d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Poormon v. Regan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARY A. POORMON, Petitioner, v. EDWARD V. REGAN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 5, 1987

Citations

134 A.D.2d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Matter of Peterson v. Regan

Respondent determined that petitioner is not permanently disabled and this proceeding followed. Respondent…

Matter of Leone v. Regan

We disagree. Respondent was faced with conflicting medical opinions as to petitioner's disability and her…