From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pokoik v. Dept. of Health Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 1986
119 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

April 7, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McInerney, J.).


Judgment reversed, with one bill of costs, motion denied, and proceeding reinstated. The respondents' time to answer the petition is extended until 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

In dismissing the proceeding, Special Term mischaracterized it as one in the nature of mandamus to review rather than mandamus to compel. Special Term dismissed for lack of a final determination, concluding that the proceeding was premature. However, a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 sounding in mandamus to compel may lie in the absence of a final determination (see, Matter of Hamptons Hosp. Med. Center v Moore, 52 N.Y.2d 88, 96). We conclude that if the petitioner proves the allegations in his petition he will be entitled to relief by way of mandamus to compel pursuant to Public Health Law §§ 13, 1340 (2) (a). Mollen, P.J., Rubin, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Pokoik v. Dept. of Health Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 1986
119 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of Pokoik v. Dept. of Health Services

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LEE POKOIK, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 7, 1986

Citations

119 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Wyndham Realty Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Some confusion arises, however, because the statute adds to the common-law writs of mandamus, prohibition and…

Raynes Associates Ltd. Partnership v. State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Upon considered reflection, it is appropriate to grant movant's application and to remand this matter to…