From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pierre-Lewis v. Tomei

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 8, 1990
157 A.D.2d 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

January 8, 1990


Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements, and the provision of the order to show cause of this court, dated November 16, 1989, staying the respondent from further prosecuting the petitioner under Kings County indictment No. 8343/88, is vacated forthwith.

Unlike the situation in which a criminal trial has resulted in a judgment of acquittal, retrial of an indictment is not automatically barred where the merits of the charges against the defendant have not been finally resolved (Matter of Plummer v Rothwax, 63 N.Y.2d 243, 249). Where, as here, a mistrial was ordered at the request of the petitioner and there is no evidence of bad faith or an intention by the prosecutor to provoke a mistrial motion, retrial is not barred by the double jeopardy protections (People v. Ferguson, 67 N.Y.2d 383, 388; People v Presley, 136 A.D.2d 949; Matter of Owen v. Harrigan, 131 A.D.2d 20, 23). Accordingly, the instant petition is denied. Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Pierre-Lewis v. Tomei

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 8, 1990
157 A.D.2d 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Pierre-Lewis v. Tomei

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JEAN PIERRE-LEWIS, Petitioner, v. ALBERT TOMEI, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 8, 1990

Citations

157 A.D.2d 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
549 N.Y.S.2d 763

Citing Cases

People v. Morales

Consequently, the failure to give defense an opportunity to withdraw the motion, upon the circumstances and…