From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Picone v. Tallman Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 22, 1980
75 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

May 22, 1980


Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed May 3, 1979. On August 20, 1975, claimant sustained a subendocardial infarction. His average weekly wage was $350. The board affirmed an award of compensation at the rate of $125 per week from August 21, 1975 to February 25, 1976 for causally related total disability, and at the rate of $58.33 reduced earnings thereafter. The latter rate was based on a finding that claimant had a 25% causally related disability after February 25, 1976. This appeal ensued. We reject appellants' contention that the referee found that only 25% of claimant's total disability was attributable to his compensable infarction. We also reject claimant's reliance on Matter of Pappas v. Memorial Sloan Kettering Inst. ( 37 A.D.2d 887). The board, in our opinion, properly established a rate of $58.33 (Matter of Pezzella v. Syra Inds., 36 A.D.2d 885; Workers' Compensation Law, § 15, subd 5). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers' Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Sweeney, J.P., Staley, Jr., Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Picone v. Tallman Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 22, 1980
75 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Matter of Picone v. Tallman Construction Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of VINCENT PICONE, Respondent, v. TALLMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 22, 1980

Citations

75 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Matter of Harris v. Inc. Village of Westbury

(See Matter of Burt v. W.M. Girvan, Inc., 62 A.D.2d 1108.) The board, on appeal, alleges that its computation…

Matter of Agostino v. Trocom Constr. Corp.

On this appeal, the sole question presented is whether the board erred in fixing the weekly compensation rate…