From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Photosound, Inc. v. Gourdine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 13, 1986
118 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

March 13, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur E. Blyn, J.).


This appeal stems from two motions made by counsel for Photosound to hold in contempt two attorneys of the Department of Consumers Affairs (DCA) due to their failure to serve a copy of a judgment against Photosound with "notice of entry." Special Term denied the motions and after concluding that Photosound's motions constituted an intolerable abuse of process, directed counsel for Photosound to pay to DCA attorney's fees in the sum of $2,000 to compensate for DCA's "unnecessary expenditure of time and effort." The primary issue on appeal centers on whether Special Term had the "inherent power" to assess the $2,000 sanction. The Second Department, in Gabrelian v. Gabrelian ( 108 A.D.2d 445), has held that courts are empowered to impose a financial assessment upon a party or its attorney for general abuse of judicial process under the so-called "inherent powers doctrine", a power which must in any case be exercised with great restraint. We do not find it necessary to reach the issue of whether such an inherent power exists, as we do not believe that the circumstances here warrant the exercise of such a power.

Concur — Sandler, J.P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ. [ 126 Misc.2d 495.]


Summaries of

Matter of Photosound, Inc. v. Gourdine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 13, 1986
118 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of Photosound, Inc. v. Gourdine

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PHOTOSOUND, INC., Appellant, v. SIMON P. GOURDINE, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1986

Citations

118 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

N.Y.S. Office of Victim Servs. ex rel. Gold v. Robinson

Gold appeals and we affirm."To make a finding of civil contempt, it must be shown that, to a reasonable…