Opinion
August 20, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.).
Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court, Kings County, dismissed the instant proceeding on the grounds that the petitioner failed to properly serve the named respondents and did not name and serve all of the objectors who filed specifications of objections with the Board of Elections. The court's findings as to the service of the petition are supported by the record. Moreover, as the petitioner failed to name and serve all of those who filed objections to the designating petition, the instant proceeding was jurisdictionally defective (see, Matter of Gadsen v Board of Elections, 57 N.Y.2d 751; Matter of Wein v Molinari, 51 N.Y.2d 717; Matter of Cappellazzi v Toto, 41 N.Y.2d 1050; Matter of Crafts v McNab, 96 A.D.2d 915, lv denied 60 N.Y.2d 552; Matter of Macri v D'Apice, 122 A.D.2d 905; Matter of Malave-Dilan v Pair, 122 A.D.2d 906). Bracken, J.P., Niehoff, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.