Opinion
May 3, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), dated June 10, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the determination under review, which revoked a previously-issued special use permit due to noncompliance with the stated conditions, was supported by substantial evidence, and was neither arbitrary nor capricious ( see generally, Matter of Buitenkant v. Robohm, 122 A.D.2d 791).
The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.
Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.