From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pauson v. Manger Vanderbilt Hotel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 1958
7 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

November 10, 1958

Present — Foster, P.J., Bergan, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.


Appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen's Compensation Board for death benefits. The board has found, upon substantial evidence, that decedent, a wine steward employed by a hotel, while lifting and transporting heavy cases of liquor and soda from stacks in various places in the wine cellar, experienced pains and other symptoms of cardiac distress and that these work activities caused an unusual strain on his heart, already weakened by a pre-existing disease, resulting in an acute myocardial infarction and death four days later. The evidence warrants the conclusion that although the work on that day may have been no more arduous than usual, it was "sufficiently strenuous to require more than normal exertion" ( Matter of Burris v. Lewis, 2 N.Y.2d 323, 326) and the findings seem to us sufficient to express that conclusion. Appellants stress the observation of claimant's medical expert that "this was not the day for him to be doing this work at all" but this does not negate accidental causation. In a recent case an award was sustained upon facts similar to those disclosed by this record and there, too, it was said that, in view of decedent's pre-existing heart condition, he should not have been doing the type of work that he was performing at the time of his attack. ( Matter of Kelpin v. Watts Sons, 5 A.D.2d 722, motion for leave to appeal denied 4 N.Y.2d 675.) The award is sustainable on the additional ground that decedent's "continuance of work involving physical exertion after he suffered an attack in the course of employment is a sufficient identification of the event in time and circumstance, to constitute an accident where it is followed soon after by a serious coronary condition and both are associated by medical opinion." ( Matter of Carlin v. Colgate Aircraft Corp., 276 App. Div. 881, affd. 301 N.Y. 754; Matter of Cuvelier v. Fairbanks Walvoord, 6 A.D.2d 920, and cases there cited.) Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Pauson v. Manger Vanderbilt Hotel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 1958
7 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Matter of Pauson v. Manger Vanderbilt Hotel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of SOPHIE PAUSON, Respondent, against MANGER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1958

Citations

7 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Matter of Schutzel v. Gelobters Distributors

The award is further supported by the line of cases holding that an employee's "continuance of work involving…

Claim of Melillo v. La Sala Contracting Co.

There is substantial medical evidence that decedent would not have died except for the physical exertion of…