From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 7, 1991
171 A.D.2d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

March 7, 1991

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Even after a second and final written warning from his employer that continued lateness would result in his dismissal, claimant continued to be late on three more occasions and he was therefore discharged. At the hearings, claimant not only admitted that he was late on several occasions, but he acknowledged receipt of the warnings. Finally, although claimant contends that his lateness was partially due to abdominal pains, he failed to substantiate this claim. Under the circumstances, the determination that claimant's continued lateness constituted misconduct is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld (see, Matter of Grosso [Levine], 52 A.D.2d 964).

Decision affirmed, without costs. Casey, J.P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 7, 1991
171 A.D.2d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Paul

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of PADGETT PAUL, Appellant. THOMAS F. HARTNETT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 7, 1991

Citations

171 A.D.2d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
567 N.Y.S.2d 192

Citing Cases

In re Matter of Starr

The record contains substantial evidence in support of the Board's finding. Claimant admitted that he had a…

In re Ducat

Additionally, the record reveals that claimant was consistently late for work despite his employer's warnings…