From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Parsons

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jun 13, 1996
678 A.2d 1022 (D.C. 1996)

Opinion

No. 96-BG-119.

June 13, 1996.

Before FARRELL and KING, Associate Judges; and MACK, Senior Judge.


AMENDED ORDER


On consideration of the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, recommending that the respondent be publicly censured for commingling a client's funds in violation of Disciplinary Rule 9-103(A), the letter from Bar Counsel electing not to note an exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, and it appearing that respondent elected not to note an exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is

ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule XI, § 11(f)(1) of the Rules Governing the Bar, effective January 1, 1995, the recommendation by the Board on Professional Responsibility to impose discipline consisting of publicly censuring respondent is hereby adopted; it is, accordingly,

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent, Charles C. Parsons, be and he hereby is, publicly censured.


Summaries of

Matter of Parsons

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jun 13, 1996
678 A.2d 1022 (D.C. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Parsons

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Charles C. PARSONS, Esquire. A Member of the Bar of the…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 13, 1996

Citations

678 A.2d 1022 (D.C. 1996)

Citing Cases

In re Goldberg

See, e.g., In re Teitelbaum, 686 A.2d 1037 (D.C. 1996) (per curiam); In re Parsons, 678 A.2d 1022 (D.C. 1996)…

In re Clyman

The Board's recommended sanction is within the range of sanctions imposed for violations of the rule against…