From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Park West Village Associates v. Abrams

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1985
481 N.E.2d 567 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued May 2, 1985

Decided June 4, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Martin Evans, J.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( James M. Morrissey, Robert Hermann, Peter Sherwood and Oliver A. Rosengart of counsel), appellant pro se. Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Fay Leoussis and Leonard Koerner of counsel), for the City of New York, appellant.

Joseph L. Forstadt and Robin J. Stout for Park West Village Associates, respondent.

Joel J. Spector and Richard S. Fries for Coliseum Park Apartments Company and others, respondents.

Bradley R. Brewer for the Metropolitan Council on Housing and others, amici curiae. Eugene G. Eisner and Elizabeth A. Werby for Park West Village Tenants' Association, amicus curiae. Stephen J. Marcus and Carole L. Weidman for Coliseum Park Tenants' Association, amicus curiae.


Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinions by Justice Martin Evans at Supreme Court, New York County.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER. Taking no part: Judge TITONE.


Summaries of

Matter of Park West Village Associates v. Abrams

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1985
481 N.E.2d 567 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Park West Village Associates v. Abrams

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PARK WEST VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, Respondent, v. ROBERT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 4, 1985

Citations

481 N.E.2d 567 (N.Y. 1985)
481 N.E.2d 567
492 N.Y.S.2d 27

Citing Cases

Jo & Wo Realty Corp. v. City of New York

If, however, as plaintiff concedes for the sake of argument, the site is still subject to an urban renewal…

FGL & L Property Corp. v. City of Rye

Nothing in that subdivision speaks to ownership rather than use, and while it does not expressly forbid…