From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pantaleone v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 9, 1994
204 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 9, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner alleged that he was discharged from his position as a probationary correction officer as a result of age discrimination in violation of Executive Law § 296, and that the decision to terminate his employment was thus arbitrary and capricious, and made in bad faith.

It is well settled that the termination of employment of a probationary employee without a hearing must be upheld unless there is a demonstration that the dismissal was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation of statutory or decisional law (Matter of York v. McGuire, 63 N.Y.2d 760, 761).

In order to make out a prima facie case of age discrimination, the petitioner must establish in the first instance that he was qualified for the position he held (Mayer v. Manton Cork Corp., 126 A.D.2d 526). It is uncontroverted, on this record, that petitioner had failed during his probationary period to qualify in a "firearm training/unsafe procedures" course, was failing a course in defensive tactics, and had missed other required courses due to several absences. The petitioner was notified by letter dated April 19, 1990, that he was being discharged due to his unsatisfactory performance. Thereafter, the petitioner wrote letters to the respondent Commissioner of Corrections in which he made no claim of age discrimination, conceded that he had failed his required courses and examinations and acknowledged that he was suffering from great stress, which had adversely affected his work performance.

We find that the court properly dismissed the petition based on the uncontroverted evidence of the petitioner's unsatisfactory job performance (see, Matter of Engoren v. County of Nassau, 163 A.D.2d 520, 521). The petitioner's claim that his discharge was arbitrary and capricious and in bad faith is not supported by the record (see, Matter of Holmes v. Sielaff, 182 A.D.2d 557). Miller, J.P., Altman, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Pantaleone v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 9, 1994
204 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Pantaleone v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY PANTALEONE, Appellant, v. NORWOOD E. JACKSON, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 9, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
611 N.Y.S.2d 631

Citing Cases

Matter of Pantaleone v. Jackson

Decided September 29, 1994 Appeal from (2d Dept: 204 A.D.2d 458) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…

Matter of Gulemi v. Bradley

Dept., June 7, 1999]; Matter of Williams v. Commr. of Off. of Mental Health of State of N.Y., 259 A.D.2d 623;…