From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Palega

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Aug 16, 1955
208 Misc. 966 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1955)

Opinion

August 16, 1955.

Benjamin Esberg for Anna Palega, as administratrix of the estate of Joseph Palega, deceased, petitioner.

Rabinowitz Hornstein for Nicholas J. Palega, respondent.


In this discovery proceeding the administratrix seeks to recover the assets of a window cleaning business. Respondent, son of decedent, claims title as surviving partner to one half of such property. Respondent's defense of laches is dismissed.

The certified copy of the certificate of partnership filed pursuant to section 440 of the Penal Law raises the presumption that decedent and respondent became partners as of March 5, 1953 (Penal Law, § 440, subd. 6). This presumption was not overcome by the proof offered at the hearing. As a result there is no jurisdiction in this court to compel delivery of any assets which constituted partnership property ( Matter of Lichtblau, 146 Misc. 278; Matter of Katz, 63 N.Y.S.2d 298; Matter of Kurzbam, N.Y.L.J., March 5, 1953, p. 738, col. 7; see Matter of Di Stefano, 63 N.Y.S.2d 296, and Partnership Law, § 51, subd. 2, par. [d]). Based upon the evidence, however, the court finds that when decedent converted the business from a sole proprietorship to a partnership with respondent, he retained title to all the tangible assets used in his business. In such a situation, although these individual assets are used by the partnership, they do not become partnership property. (See Hillock v. Grape, 111 A.D. 720; Matter of Lichtblau, supra, pp. 280-281; Van Voorhis v. Webster, 85 Hun 591; Niagara Co. Nat. Bank v. Lord, 33 Hun 557; Quinn v. Reed, 85 Misc. 510, and Summa v. Masterson, 215 A.D. 159.) In addition, ownership of the accounts receivable and the deposits receivable was retained by decedent and was not transferred to the respondent personally or to the partnership. Accordingly, the court holds that petitioner is entitled in this proceeding to recovery of all the items, their value or the proceeds therefrom, as set forth in the stipulation filed herein, with the exception of cash and the unexpired employees' liability insurance. Determination of the interest, if any, of the estate in the above-excepted items must await a partnership accounting. (See Partnership Law, § 74, and Matter of Lutz, 202 Misc. 903, affd. 281 A.D. 809.)

Submit decree on one day's notice.


Summaries of

Matter of Palega

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Aug 16, 1955
208 Misc. 966 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1955)
Case details for

Matter of Palega

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of JOSEPH PALEGA, Deceased

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County

Date published: Aug 16, 1955

Citations

208 Misc. 966 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1955)
145 N.Y.S.2d 271

Citing Cases

SATNICK v. Commissioner

There is no evidence of any partnership agreement between Hartley and Lenore. While the filing of a…

Matter of Sachs

" (To the same effect see Matter of Thomas, 235 App. Div. 450; Matter of Katz, 63 N.Y.S.2d 298; Matter of…