From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Orologio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 27, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 27, 1993

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


On this appeal claimant contends that the Commissioner of Labor failed to file his notice of appeal from the decision of the Administrative Law Judge within the 20-day time period specified in Labor Law § 621 (1). The Commissioner has failed to address this issue in his responding brief. According to the date stamp thereon, the decision of the Administrative Law Judge was mailed and filed on March 19, 1991. The record clearly establishes that the Commissioner did not file his notice of appeal until 21 days later on April 9, 1991. Under these circumstances, and given the fact that the time periods stated in the statute are to be strictly enforced, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board lacked jurisdiction to entertain the Commissioner's appeal (see, Matter of Kulawiak [Ross], 82 A.D.2d 1014; Matter of Fleischman [Levine], 50 A.D.2d 1007; Matter of Murphy [Catherwood], 32 A.D.2d 593).

Weiss, P.J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is reversed, without costs, and decision of the Administrative Law Judge awarding claimant unemployment insurance benefits is reinstated.


Summaries of

Matter of Orologio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 27, 1993
193 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Orologio

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOANNE L. OROLOGIO, Appellant. JOHN F. HUDACS, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 27, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
598 N.Y.S.2d 371

Citing Cases

Matter of Fernandez

The employer applied for, and was granted, a hearing to challenge this determination. Claimant's principal…

In re Moorer

Claimant appeals. A stamp on the face of the decision of the Administrative Law Judge indicates that it was…