Opinion
October 10, 1995
Appeal from the Family Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The evidence adduced at the hearing to determine, inter alia, the mother's compliance with certain "aftercare recommendations" promulgated pursuant to the Family Court's order dated January 22, 1991, established that although the appellant was clearly apprised of the exact terms of the "aftercare recommendations", she nevertheless failed to comply with at least several of the recommendations. Because, pursuant to the order dated January 22, 1991, strict compliance with all the terms and conditions of the "aftercare recommendations" was a condition of the the Family Court's suspension of the termination of the appellant's parental rights, the Family Court properly terminated her parental rights at this juncture. Mangano, P.J., Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.