From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of O'Neill v. Beisheim

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 17, 1976
39 N.Y.2d 924 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Argued May 6, 1976

Decided June 17, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.

Henry J. Boitel for appellant.

Carl A. Vergari, District Attorney (Janet Cunard of counsel), respondent pro se.


Judgment affirmed, without costs. Prohibition is not now warranted where the trial sought to be prohibited has been held and where the issues tendered may be raised on the direct appeal following such trial now pending in the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.


Summaries of

Matter of O'Neill v. Beisheim

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 17, 1976
39 N.Y.2d 924 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of O'Neill v. Beisheim

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HAROLD O'NEILL, Appellant, v. GEORGE BEISHEIM, JR., as a…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 17, 1976

Citations

39 N.Y.2d 924 (N.Y. 1976)
386 N.Y.S.2d 576
352 N.E.2d 880

Citing Cases

Shawn James Coffee v. Argento

The petition must be dismissed as time-barred because it was filed well beyond the four-month statute of…

Seiler v. Crandall

hibition or mandamus lies only where there is a clear legal right, and in the case of prohibition only when a…