From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Omaro v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 3, 2000
269 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 3, 2000

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Derrick R. Omaro, Pine City, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., CREW III, SPAIN, GRAFFEO and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a tier III hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting the solicitation of a sexual offense, threats, harassment and impersonation. Thereafter, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding alleging certain procedural defects with respect to the hearing and the absence of substantial evidence to support respondent's determination of guilt.

Contrary to petitioner's argument, the detailed misbehavior report, the testimony of the correction officers involved in the incident and the letters sent to one of the correction counselors provided substantial evidence of petitioner's misconduct (see,Matter of Sheppard v. Goord, 264 A.D.2d 916, 695 N.Y.S.2d 205).

We have examined petitioner's allegations of Hearing Officer bias and, in light of the hearing transcript which demonstrates that the Hearing Officer informed petitioner of his rights and conducted a fair and impartial hearing, petitioner has failed to show that the outcome of the hearing was the result of any alleged bias (see, Matter of McCorkle v. Selsky, 264 A.D.2d 890, 696 N.Y.S.2d 85). Any gaps in the hearing transcript were not so significant as to preclude meaningful review (see, Matter of Miller v. Goord, 262 A.D.2d 906, 693 N.Y.S.2d 258). Petitioner's remaining arguments have been reviewed and are also found to be lacking in merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Omaro v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 3, 2000
269 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Omaro v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DERRICK R. OMARO, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 3, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 923

Citing Cases

Rivera v. Goord

When he called the names of the inmates who were to be dropped off at Gouverneur Correctional Facility in St.…

Matter of Johnson v. Selsky

the Hearing Officer was entitled to resolve against him (see,Matter of Torres v. Goord, ___ A.D.2d ___, ___,…