From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of O'Connor v. D'Apice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1989
156 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

December 22, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.).


Ordered that the judgment dated December 14, 1989 is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is granted, and Michael G. O'Connor is declared to have been duly elected on November 7, 1989 to the public office of Member of the Town Council of the Town of Ossining; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment dated December 20, 1989 is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding No. 2 is dismissed.

The primary issue concerns the paper ballots from the 29th Election District, which were counted and included in the election results, and were certified by the election inspectors on duty, but were never delivered to the Westchester County Board of Elections. Contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court in proceeding No. 1, we find that because the paper ballots from the 29th Election District were never delivered to the Westchester County Board of Elections, those ballots should not have been counted. The removal of those seven ballots from the tabulation leaves Michael G. O'Connor with the second highest total of votes for the public office of Member of the Town Council of the Town of Ossining. He and the candidate with the highest number of votes were duly elected.

We further find that the Supreme Court properly dismissed Francis X. Lynett's cross claim in proceeding No. 1 inasmuch as a cross claim is not permitted in a special proceeding without leave of court (see, Matter of Williams v Rensselaer County Bd. of Elections, 98 A.D.2d 938, appeal dismissed 61 N.Y.2d 737). Furthermore, because proceeding No. 2 was instituted more than 20 days "after the election or alleged erroneous statement or determination was made" it should have been dismissed as untimely (Election Law § 16-106; Matter of Williams v Rensselaer County Bd. of Elections, supra; Matter of Giglia v Carlsen, 55 A.D.2d 1018).

In light of our disposition, we do not reach Michael G. O'Connor's remaining contentions. Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Brown and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of O'Connor v. D'Apice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1989
156 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of O'Connor v. D'Apice

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL G. O'CONNOR, Appellant, v. ANTONIA D'APICE et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1989

Citations

156 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Matter of Zenosky v. Graziani

Pursuant to CPLR 402, the pleadings in a special proceeding are limited to a petition, an answer, and a reply…

Matter of Paladino v. Weininger

It is clear that to cross-claim in an election law proceeding, prior leave of court is required. CPLR 402;…