From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of O'Connell v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 29, 1965
24 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

November 29, 1965


Proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to annul a determination of the respondent Commissioner of Motor Vehicles which suspended petitioner's operator's license for 60 days for violation of section 1154 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. By order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 4, 1965, the proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition. Determination confirmed, without costs. Upon all the facts adduced at the hearing, we are of the opinion that there is substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the Referee that petitioner failed to exercise due care to avoid colliding with a pedestrian in Hartsdale, New York, on April 1, 1965. (See Matter of Deutsch v. Hults, 10 A.D.2d 724.) Beldock, P.J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of O'Connell v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 29, 1965
24 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Matter of O'Connell v. Hults

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NORMAN B. O'CONNELL, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM S. HULTS, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 29, 1965

Citations

24 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Matter of Fazzone v. Adduci

Thus, substantial evidence exists to support the determination at issue. We also find that, in light of the…