From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Occhino v. Hostetter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 21, 1964
21 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

May 21, 1964

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed in the interests of justice, answer in its present form stricken, with leave to serve a new and proper answer within 20 days after service of a copy of the order with notice of entry thereof, with costs to petitioner-respondent against the appellants. Memorandum: 7804, subd. (e) CPLR required the respondents to file with their answer a record of the proceedings under review. This they failed to do. Under this same section Special Term had the power to order the defect or omission to be supplied. This was not done. The answer is therefore dismissed and in the interests of justice the respondents are granted permission to interpose a new and proper answer.


Summaries of

Matter of Occhino v. Hostetter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 21, 1964
21 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Matter of Occhino v. Hostetter

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAYMOND A. OCCHINO, Respondent, v. DONALD S. HOSTETTER et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 21, 1964

Citations

21 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Matter of Kurtz v. Krone

Respondents failed to file with their answer a certified transcript of the record of the proceedings under…

Duquin v. Colucci

On remittal, the Commission is directed to file with their answer the disputed questions and answers for the…