From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York Public Interest Research Group v. Giuliani

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1996
228 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 13, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.).


The authority of elected officials to appoint is a "power" within the meaning of Municipal Home Rule Law § 23 (2) (f) and New York City Charter § 38 (5), and therefore any law that would abolish, transfer or curtail such must be approved by referendum ( see, Morin v. Foster, 45 N.Y.2d 287, 295; Ferraro v. Rettaliata, 165 A.D.2d 860, 861-862, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 713). The New York City Charter, adopted in 1989 by a referendum, mandates in sections 259 and 1152 that certain elected officials appoint a director of an Independent Budget Office by August 1, 1990 and that the IBO be funded in a mandatory minimum amount. Local Laws, 1994, No. 30 of the City of New York delays the appointment and funding of the IBO. We agree with petitioner's argument that the power to delay (without limit) is the power to destroy. In any event, since that postponement would curtail a power of elected officials, it is invalid in the absence of an approving referendum.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

New York Public Interest Research Group v. Giuliani

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1996
228 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

New York Public Interest Research Group v. Giuliani

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 13, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 38

Citing Cases

NYC MAYOR v. COUNCIL OF NYC

" (NY City Charter § 6 [a].) Plaintiffs are correct that the authority of plaintiff Mayor to appoint members…

Mayor of New York v. Council of New York

Plaintiffs are correct that the authority of Plaintiff Mayor to appoint members of the Board is a power…