From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of N.Y. Ctl. Mut. F. Ins. v. Paillant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted January 5, 2000

February 17, 2000

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7503 N.Y.CPLR to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated January 7, 1999, which granted the petition and deemed it to have insured a vehicle owned by Roxanne J. Cummings.

McDonnell, Adels Goodstein, P.C. (Anita Nissan Yehuda, Roslyn Heights, N.Y., of counsel), for proposed additional respondent-appellant.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the joinder of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Roxanne J. Cummings, and Leonard Roy Griffith as necessary parties, and a new determination of the petition in accordance herewith.

The documents submitted by the parties raised issues of fact as to whether the offending vehicle was uninsured within the meaning of the policy issued by the petitioner New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company to the respondent Ambroise Paillant, and whether the alleged insurer of the offending vehicle, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter State Farm), had properly disclaimed coverage (see, Matter of Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Sillman, 266 A.D.2d 551 [2d Dept., Nov. 29, 1999]; Matter of Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Beliard, 256 A.D.2d 579). Therefore, it was improper for the Supreme Court to determine that the offending vehicle was insured without the joinder of State Farm and the additional proposed respondents and, if necessary, a hearing (see, Matter of Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Sillman, supra; Matter of State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vazquez, 249 A.D.2d 312; Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v. Sadiq, 237 A.D.2d 605; Matter of Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. v. Boiano, 199 A.D.2d 314).


Summaries of

Matter of N.Y. Ctl. Mut. F. Ins. v. Paillant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of N.Y. Ctl. Mut. F. Ins. v. Paillant

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 883

Citing Cases

Matter of Eagle Insurance v. Lucero

v. Renna, 273 A.D.2d 210 [2d Dept., June 5, 2000]; McCorvey v. Shoulder, 273 A.D.2d 207 [2d Dept., June 5,…

Atlantic Mutual Ins. Co. v. Matera

ORDERED that the order dated May 2, 2002, is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs to the…