From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of N.Y. Cen. Mut. Fire Ins. v. Shepard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 27, 1998
249 A.D.2d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 27, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order dated August 13, 1997, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated February 14, 1997, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the petitioner-respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant failed to file a timely proof-of-claim form with her insurer as required by the terms of the insurance policy ( see generally, Heydt Contr. Corp. v. American Home Assur. Co., 146 A.D.2d 497). The appellant's remaining contention that the petitioner insurer failed to timely disclaim coverage is without merit ( see, Matter of Aetna Life Cas. v. Ocasio, 232 A.D.2d 409).

Mangano, P.J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of N.Y. Cen. Mut. Fire Ins. v. Shepard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 27, 1998
249 A.D.2d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of N.Y. Cen. Mut. Fire Ins. v. Shepard

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 27, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 353

Citing Cases

Mut. Fire v. Ward

The insurer failed to show any prejudice and, under the circumstances, was not permitted to disclaim SUM…

In re New York Central Mutual Fire

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the petitioner. The appellants' failure to file a sworn…